What do fires emit
With wildfires burning farther north , emissions from wildfires in Greenland or Sweden could add significantly to the load of snow-darkening pollution in the Arctic because the sources are so close to the ice sheets. A study in Alaska estimated that risk of tundra fires will increase fourfold in the coming decades. With time running out to try and cap global warming at well-below 1.
Understanding how emissions form during wildfires could also help in the design of mitigation strategies to reduce their impact, said Christine Wiedinmyer, associate science director of the Cooperative Institute for Research In Environmental Sciences CIRES in Boulder, Colorado. For example, a recent CIRES research project suggests that hotter, uncontrolled fires produce more harmful substances.
Introducing controlled fires that generally are not as hot could help reduce emissions. The current increase in extreme fires in some regions is part of a global ecosystem shift driven by human-caused global warming, Denning said. He warned that societies need to adopt strong policies to prevent huge regions of carbon-storing forests from being replaced by lower-carbon grasslands and shrubs. Bob Berwyn an Austrian-based freelance reporter who has covered climate science and international climate policy for more than a decade.
Previously, he reported on the environment, endangered species and public lands for several Colorado newspapers, and also worked as editor and assistant editor at community newspapers in the Colorado Rockies. The U. ICN provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going.
Skip to content The extreme wildfires sweeping across parts of North America, Europe and Siberia this year are not only wreaking local damage and sending choking smoke downwind. Newsletters We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Get ICN Weekly. Get Inside Clean Energy. Today's Climate Twice-a-week A digest of the most pressing climate-related news, released every Tuesday and Friday.
Get Today's Climate. Get Breaking News. Fire-related emissions in are already 3 times higher than the historical 21 st -century average in California, Oregon and Washington, and we are by no means at the end of fire season. In California, the worst days of wildfires have generated emissions that are roughly 4 to 8 times higher than the average daily emissions from all economic activity across the state.
While emissions from fires contribute to the warming that begins this vicious cycle, they are far from the only source of carbon dioxide emissions. Burning fossil fuels — for example to power our homes and our cars — is the leading source of emissions globally. Not too long ago, the idea of surpassing parts per million ppm of carbon dioxide, a symbolic threshold which Earth has not experienced for millions of years, felt quite far off.
By , CO2 concentrations were well beyond the ppm threshold, reaching ppm. For context, pre-industrial concentrations of carbon dioxide were ppm. This buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is rapidly warming the planet.
The past decade was the warmest on record , with each decade warmer than the one that preceded it. With proper management, fire regimes are a natural and important part of maintaining the long-term vitality of forests across the Western United States. However, we need to be smarter about where we build and rebuild our communities.
New housing is increasingly moving closer to forests and other natural vegetation, leading to more wildfires from human-caused ignitions and greater losses to human lives and property.
A tiny spark now has potential to cascade into a raging fire, fueled by higher temperatures, drier conditions and rising emissions. As this vicious cycle plays out and predictions of extreme future fire seasons continue, the need for human intervention to interrupt this cycle has never been more clear. Climate change is raising average global temperatures, bringing with it longer droughts, with cascading effects for forests and wildfires.
These impacts are highly place-dependent — they are determined by the ecology an ecosystem and its history of disturbance, like wildfires, insect outbreaks or logging. Across many forest types, increasing temperatures and droughts dry out fuels, including vegetation like dead trees and fallen branches , more quickly and completely, priming them to burn. In some forests in California and British Columbia, climate impacts can reduce snowpack and speed up spring snow melt , which can lead to even drier vegetation and increase fire risk.
In ecosystems plagued by drought, like areas of the southwestern U. As a driver of climate change, wildfires release huge quantities of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In British Columbia, extreme fire years in and each produced three times more greenhouse gases than all other sectors of the province combined. While trees can and do regrow after fire, building back carbon takes time, which is precisely what we lack in the fight against climate change.
People, specifically European colonizers in North America, have created and perpetuated conditions that increase the risk of large, severe fires. We are just one of many species that suffer from the consequences. For example, carbon monoxide concentrations across Africa and South America go hand in hand with fire counts there.
When fire counts are high, carbon monoxide is high; when fire counts are low, carbon monoxide is low. These increases and decreases follow an obvious seasonal pattern, linked to human cultural patterns of agricultural burning and land clearing. In other parts of the world, however, carbon monoxide levels are elevated even during months when fire counts are low.
About half way up the eastern coast of Asia, for example, a pocket of high carbon monoxide appears virtually year round, even when fires are not occurring nearby.
Here, the carbon monoxide is part of the urban and industrial pollution generated in and around rapidly industrializing Beijing, China. A similar pattern exists over the United States, the North Atlantic, and western Europe, which have relatively high yellow carbon monoxide concentrations even in December, January, and February, when fire activity throughout the middle and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere is very low. That pattern suggests that the carbon monoxide is coming from the burning of fossil fuels and also perhaps from wood-burning stoves or fireplaces.
0コメント