When was jennifer willmott born

Many of the attorneys Jennifer has instructed. Main Details. Please login to post content on this page. A new category was created:. Press Enter to post. The jury had deliberated nearly 14 hours over three Permalink Flag.

Jury in Jodi Arias murder trial struggling to reach a unanimous decision on sentencing PHOENIX — A frustrated-looking jury has come out of deliberations during the penalty phase of the Jodi Arias murder trial unable to reach a unanimous verdict. Jurors are debating whether Arias should be sentenced to life in prison or get the Arias initially denied involvement and later blamed the killing on masked intruders.

Geffner has no idea about the coded message in the magazines. The poor court reporter is probably working up a good case off carpal-tunnel syndrome right around now. Juan is attacking, demanding Yes or No answers. Judge Stephens overrules the objection. Judge Stephens seems to have a very simple formula for objections. On direct and cross she sustains most objections. On re-cross and re-direct, she simply overrules most objections. Sidebars abound. The main point Juan wants to make is that Jodi Arias, still clinging to the ridiculous Ninja-intruder story, claimed a non-sexual attack by a stranger as the trauma giving rise to PTSD.

The prosecution claims this invalidates the entire test, the defense claims it does not, that the trauma was actually a non-sexual attack by a known person, and all the other answers are valid. Jodi Arias suffers from Post-Traumatic Stress.

Who cares if it was a Lion or a Tiger, or even a Bear? The attack is the same. Geffner complains that the test questions are copyrighted and should not be shown to the public. Juan calls Dr. Geffner combative. The hungry leopards hang onto the hapless zebra and commence tearing flesh. The zebra is trying to shake them off. Geffner tries to say that Martinez is mixing up two different tests.

Geffner reads verbatim from the test to show that Juan Martinez is paraphrasing and mischaracterizing what was said on the test. Juan transitions out of this and he questions Dr. Juan Martinez is licensed to pounce. Willmott explains that practicing in Arizona requires a license, testifying does not. This is where my theory about Juan Martinez comes in. Once in a while, Martinez will just throw things in that seem to be trivial, not related, to make no sense.

He has had co-prosecutors in the past. My theory is that he has a set way of handling witnesses. Juan has a list of testimony he wants to elicit, and points he wants to make. He brings up things which are irrelevant or not really important, just to keep the defense from discovering his system, which is pretty straightforward.

Judge Sherry Stephens sends the jury out. Witness 1 sees pop-ups of sexy scantily-clad women. Witness 1 knows about computers and investigates the malfunctioning computer. He claims he found some child porn. Then Travis breaks down and explains he was sexually abused at age Then Martinez and Willmott have an argument over whether or not Travis confessed to being the one responsible for the porn. The judge calls the two to the stand. They return. Geffner continues.

You would be homeless if I told the Bishop. Geffner interviewed the witness with associates. Willmott asks if Geffner believed that Travis confessed to the porn?

Geffner answers that was his understanding. Jennifer Willmott then goes on to show that Travis Alexander had another issue with porn pop-ups in From testimony we know that Alexander was again having a computer problem from a virus or malware on the day of June 4 th , Willmott gets Geffner to explain that the date witness 1 gave as the date that Travis grabbed Deanna Reid, his girlfriend at the time, and pushed her down on the couch, was off at first, but he was sure about the incident.

Jenn moves on to Jodi Arias and elicits testimony relating to the months after she killed Alexander. Geffner explains to the jury that Jodi was hazy about what happened. She was not able to come to terms with what she did, so, she made up some stories. She knew these stories made no sense, but she held onto them anyways. Wilmott asks Geffner if Jodi Arias disavowed the Ninja story and finally confessed.

Geffner says that she did. Willmott asks Geffner why she made up the story. Then she moves on to the masturbation to the photos of young boys allegation about Travis Alexander. Why was there confusion between whether the photos were paper photos or images on his laptop? She had apparently assumed it was images on a computer.

Geffner explains there was little difference, because they were still seeing each other, still having lots of sex and still hiding the relationship. Martinez likes to point out that most people do not talk about their sexual experiences and that Jodi Arias also kept it a secret.

Keeping things secret, especially in a Mormon environment, is normal and has no application to abusive behavior or any other alleged malfeasance on the part of Travis Alexander. As far as her friends, cohorts and community knew, Jodi hardly existed.

Beyond that, text messages between Travis and Lisa show a cycle of love-lust and anger-jealousy directed at Lisa Andrews by Travis. Next, Geffner and Willmott discuss the times Travis talks about marrying several women. And this is one part of this penalty re-trial and the original trial where the two sides of supporters dramatically diverge. They were talking about encounters they had in the past and planning more of them.

There was lots of sexually graphic talk, including talk about making babies, pubic hair and sexy underwear and clothes. There was talk of boobs, too. Geffner had to make a graphic chart of the women, there were so many. Arias supporters saw this as a betrayal, a web of lies and secret trysts that were most likely also happening in real life with a number of these women, at the same time, Travis was claiming love and monogamy with Jodi, consistent with the Mormon precepts and tenets.

Prosecution supporters see this as manipulation on the part of Arias, trying to keep him and draw him in by the prospect of eligible rivals in the mist.

The implication on the defense side was that this game was going on long before Travis met Jodi and continued unabated the whole time they knew each other. From a psychological point of view, Jodi Arias may have then drifted from one overbearing or controlling boyfriend to another, doing anything to gain his affections. When she was finally rejected, even as a friend, and cast aside for a younger girl, she may have lost control. Travis may have paid for the sins of the father, in addition to anything he may have done.

The defense fleshes out this line of thinking further with testimony from Dr. Travis Alexander and a woman named Chaitanya Lay are seen on texts discussing a tryst they had while at the same time, Alexander is texting and sexting with other women.

Geffner and Willmott then go into the early Chris and Sky Hughes e-mails, where Sky is talking about various ways Alexander supposedly toyed with and abused other women. Geffner explains about copyrighted Psych. Tests, relating how Juan had put the actual questions up on the big screen, and answers he got from Dr,DeMarte out onto the public record.

Geffner replies that it was Travis and witness 1 that made that connection, not him. Could it have been someone else he saw?

Geffner relates that witness 1 knows exactly who Travis and Deanna are and he knows he saw them, although he may have been mistaken on exactly what month and day he saw the altercation. I still cannot figure out why this would be an issue. There were a number of things LaViolette seems to have misunderstood. Next time, she should get a tape recorder and document when she makes an error in her notes. Geffner tried to explain why Jodi Arias made up the Ninja intruder story.

According to Jodi, it was to find a way to halt further questioning without revealing or facing up to what she had done. The questioning turns to the January 22, finger-breaking incident, where Jodi claims Travis threw her to the floor, kicked her in the ribs, and broke her finger while she was trying to protect her side.

Geffner says Jodi adheres to the law of attraction consistently in her journal entries. Geffner relates that Jodi was experiencing anxiety and depression early in her relationship with Travis. Juan Martinez suggests that perhaps Jodi was feeling these things because of financial problems and losing her house to foreclosure.

As a counter to charges that Travis was manipulating Jodi while seeing other women behind her back, Juan charges that Jodi was being manipulative with Travis in May and June, , as she was seeing Travis while also courting Ryan Burns.

Jen from The Trial Diaries reported that Jodi Arias has had the same blank stare all day long in court with no visible emotions. Geffner stated that Dr. Geffner stated this was not true at all as the encounter was casual and amicable.

He stated that Dr, D. Geffner stated that Jodi Arias had often stated that she always wanted the best for Travis, even when they were no longer an item. Prosecution supporters see this as more manipulation from Jodi Arias. The hungry pack of leopards is poised under shade trees on the periphery, ready to spring.

He stressed that the Havasupai trip was devastating for Jodi, as a nice vacation was soured by a bitter argument with a chilling aftermath. Juan Martinez registered lots of objections here, which were all overruled. In the letter, she was saying she could no longer see him. The idea was that Travis forced her to write the letter. Juan argued that she did it on her own, possibly as a manipulation of Travis to get him to commit to her, and that she never actually sent the letter.

Willmott said Arias' biggest hope is to be "able to have a contact visit and hug her mom. She hasn't been able to do that in seven years. She'd like to be able to hug her niece. Willmott, who is a public defender and was assigned Arias' case, said she received death threats throughout the trial and the police had to be involved in contacting one person to have them stop.

When asked whether she would take the case again, she said she would but would change some of the tactics they used during trial, without going into further detail.